Skip to main content

Follow Us

Social networking will appear here

Support Us

Join  |   Donate  |   Volunteer  |   Newsletter
LWV of Seattle King County is a
501 (c)(3) Charitable Organization.
Tax ID: 91-1224769

Contact Us

Email: info@lwvskc.org
Phone: (206) 329-4848
LWV of Seattle King County
1511 3rd Avenue, Suite 900
Seattle, WA 98101
    Copyright - 2020 - All Rights Reserved - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy  - Powered by ClubExpress
HomeThe Voter Newsletter

Our Newsletter

The Voter features information on our forums and other public events; our neighborhood discussion groups; volunteer opportunities; our voter registration and education efforts; and our work on issues like accountability for local government, climate change, education, health care, and police reform.


Do you have an idea? Send us your news! Contact the Voter Editor at votereditor@lwvskc.org. Submissions are due by the 15th of the month for the next edition.

View a PDF of the current issue of The Voter.

Our Mission

The League of Women Voters of Seattle-King County, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Want to work with us? Become a member!
Want to reach us? We’re at
info@lwvskc.org!
Want to support us? Donate today!

Past Issues

View past issues of The Voter.

Happy Holidays! 

Kim Albert & Barb Tengtio


The holidays are a time for reflection and thanks as well as giving and celebration.  To all of you — our LWVSKC family and friends — we thank you for your strong support and participation in LWVSKC's work this fall as we reflect upon all our accomplishments: 

  • LWVSKC volunteers have been out in the community at well over 50 organizations and events registering voters and getting out the vote. 
  • We have continued to register new citizens at the naturalization ceremonies and have been busy observing both the primary and the November King County elections. 
  • We have worked with high schools and affiliated organizations to promote civics learning. 
  • We have met as Units to promote the League's mission on a very local level. 
  • We have supported State League forums and hosted information forums on ballot initiatives. 
  • Internally, we continued the work to finalize our organization's merger to a 501(c)3 organization as well as conducted our annual audit.
  • And, we have continued to work to reduce costs and as a result will be moving to a smaller space on the 8th floor of the Melbourne Tower, effective January 1, 2025.

We celebrate our accomplishments and say thank you to all that have volunteered and/or provided financial support! And, looking forward, understand that League's work is never done. While we recently celebrated a fair and secure election, we cannot ignore that the incoming administration’s policies and rhetoric do not align with LWVSKC member and supporter positions or our organization’s values.  The new year will be even busier and LWVSKC's work will be critical to lifting up our democracy.  We will press on to promote the values and processes of representative government and envision a democracy where every person has the desire, the right, the knowledge and the confidence to participate.

We are thankful for all our members and the sharing of their gifts of knowledge and skills, time and money.  We look forward to working with you all and furthering LWVSKC's impact in the King County community in the new year.  

Peace and Joy,

Kim and Barb
Kim Albert and Barb Tengtio 
LWVSKC Co-Presidents




Return to Table of Contents



Looking for a Perfect Gift? Give Membership! 

Barb Tengtio

Wondering what to give that special friend of yours, perhaps an aunt, niece, neighbor, or VIP in your life? Why not give them a one-year LWVSKC membership? You know first-hand how important LWVSKC's work is to your community, state, and nation. Why not give others an opportunity to experience LWVSKC and the contributions they can make also? It's a win-win-win for you, the new member, and the League!

Click here to Give the Gift of Membership. 




Return to Table of Contents



Civics Learning = Empowerment

Sarah Beth Miller & Barb Tengtio


For the second year in a row, LWVSKC partnered with Inglemoor High School Social Studies teacher, Alexandra Baker, and her five senior high school classes to elevate student civics learning. As a result — the students feel empowered!

 

Alexandra complemented her civics classroom teaching with LWVSKC’s three-part Civics Comes Alive! Program. Throughout her civics class, Alexandra stresses the importance of civic discourse and she continually reminds her students to speak calmly and cite primary sources whenever possible.

The first part of the Civics Comes Alive! program consists of Civics and You!, a six-part power point interactive civics free program that includes:

  • The history of voting, demographics of who is (and isn’t) voting, and practice in making informed choices when voting
  • Potential identification issues, the characteristics of leadership, and how an individual can lead at any age

You can find this free program on our website.

 

Civics2.jpg

The second part of the program is a student-led forum. Last year, Inglemoor students organized and conducted two city council candidate forums. This year, the students hosted an issues forum on a topic of their choosing: housing. In addition to researching the issue, the students determined and invited the panelists, including:

  • Alina Aragon - real Estate Consultant, Relocation Specialist, Windermere
  • Nigel Herbig - City of Kenmore Mayor
  • Rami Al-Kabra - City of Bothell Deputy Mayor
  • Sandra Lee - Bothell/Kenmore Chamber of Commerce Executive Director
  • Dr. Ted Dezember Ed. D. - Sr Manager of Educational Initiatives and Youth Program, Policy, Research, and Social Impact Initiatives Department, King County Housing Authority
Civics3.jpg

In addition, the students marketed the program to the school and greater community. Finally, the students themselves conducted the entire forum — welcoming guests, moderating, timekeeping, photographing the event, and even writing a follow-up article for the school newspaper.


Part three of the program is practice voting. LWVSKC worked with King County elections to obtain a mock ballot that replicated the ballot students’ parents would be voting with. On election day, the students voted in class; the results were then tabulated by a League member and Alexandra discussed the results with her students relative to the actual election results.


Students then shared with each other some of their learnings and the impact it has had on them. Here is some of what they had to say:

Civics1.jpg
  • It was cool to do the sample ballot, there’s a lot more on it than I thought.
  • People do have power through their voting.
  • I feel a lot more connected and more focused because of this class and the issues forum.
  • I learned that primary sources provide much better information. It is easier to lie and/or twist things on social media.
  • Since most people use social media it is good to learn about unbiased information.
  • The issues forum was a little bit of a scary experience but I was glad I did it/was a part of it.
  • I was surprised to learn about some of the impediments to voting in the past - like literacy tests and having to own land.
  • It was interesting to learn about defacto voter disenfranchisement and du jour voter disenfranchisement.
  • I was surprised to find out about the push to remove the protections of the voting rights act.
  • It is really important to learn civic discourse. It should be required for all people.
  • It surprised me how long it took to get the right to vote.
  • Without this class, we base our assumptions on what our parents and environment/friends think.
  • Learning about politics in this class is so different than learning about politics on social media.
  • My learning has been very empowering.
  • Reading the ballot statements without looking at the party was empowering.
  • I learned a lot from the issues forum. It was impactful.
  • It felt nice to know an issues forum was going on at my school - a place I was familiar with.
  • It is important to have open minds when we discuss politics.
  • There is no civic discourse without being “civil.”
  • It is really important to hear from both sides through primary sources.
  • Apathy is the ultimate killer.
  • It takes a level of maturity to have civil discourse. It comes down to respect.
  • Voting was the most empowering experience.
  • It was empowering that there were real people at the issues forum.
  • The voting experience made me realize that voting is hard.
  • I was able to influence others who were able to really vote. That was empowering.
  • Doing research on the candidates was empowering.
  • Meeting the people at the issues forum was a really positive experience.
  • The community issues forum was tiring, but fun. The information was overwhelming.
  • It hurts that people look for loopholes to stop others from voting.
  • I enjoy having the freedom to speak my own opinions.
  • I enjoy having the choice for my religion.
  • Freedom of speech is your power.
Civics4.png

LWVSKC’s three-part Civics Comes Alive! Program is available for any high school teacher in King County and we would very much like to expand its use, partnering with other interested teachers. If you know of any teacher that might be interested in learning more and partnering with LWVSKC, please reach out to Sarah Beth Miller, unitliaison@lwvskc.org or Barb Tengtio, barbt@lwvskc.org.

Let’s increase student empowerment together!



Return to Table of Contents


Notes from LWVSKC Observers of the King County Election

Barb Tengtio

 

Thank you to LWVSK members that observed the November King County elections! Our volunteers included: Ann Marten, Susan Jones, Sally Walcott, Ricardo Vargas, Elizabeth Romney, Rachel Brooks, Marilee Gibbs, Callie Ridolfi, Keela Williams, Janet Sisson, Douglas Lucas, Gail Watts, Mo Brinck-Lund, and Janice Camp.

 

Following are notes from some of their observations of the November elections.

 

Susan Jones

The broad takeaway is how much documentation and checking of each ballot is done as it moves through the system until the final count and sign off. I watched as cartons of freshly collected ballots from drop boxes were dumped onto a table where two workers first made sure the table was clear and that the floor below was clear and they even make a notation for that. Then they have to sign off on opening the box after cutting the lock and again ensuring that the carton is empty and that nothing fell on the floor. It is a very thorough and methodical process all the way through that it is almost impossible to imagine how any fraudulent ballots would escape this kind of scrutiny.

ElectionObservation1.jpg

The most interesting part for me however was observing the section for alternative ballots. This includes everything from overseas ballots to ballots printed from the Internet and sent in inside ordinary envelopes and a dozen or more other scenarios . There were a couple of ballots from Snohomish and Pierce counties because someone living near the county lines had just deposited their ballot in the wrong dropbox and there was even a ballot that came in from New York! The supervisor there told me she will date and timestamp it to show that it was received before election day but then it will be sent back to New York State to be processed as they fit. Another supervisor told me that they occasionally get a ballot returned in an envelope from a previous election. Each of these get sorted and directed to different teams of people who process the information, sometimes having to determine the intent of the voter, but always having to enter the results manually. And when they do that, it is never done by less than two people who double check one another that the votes are entered correctly. This part of the election ballot processing is obviously very labor-intensive but is just one more way to make sure that every valid vote is counted.

 

Callie Ridolfi

I observed at the Seattle polling place on the afternoons of November 4 and 5. The Lumen Field site was calm and well orchestrated. Voter pamphlets in seven languages, a place for handicap/vision impaired to vote, greeters to help guide people, tables with pens for voting, and computers with a few dozen staff to assist in getting new ballots to qualifying voters. Welcoming environment with some staff who could provide (informal) translation. There were two police officers on duty. Photos are from the Seattle polling place.

election_observation_3_check_in_2024.png

Mo Brinck-Lund

I called to be sure they had power before heading out to Renton. I learned that they did indeed have power and a generator in place should they need it. Things were pretty quiet to the outside observer's eyes. However, KCE was a day and two night shifts behind due to the power outage so there was work being done to catch up. Only a few days left until the certification deadline on Tuesday, November 26; they were going over with a fine-tooth comb ballots that I believe were being looked at again because they had at least one selection that was unclear.

 

In talking with supervisor Josh, I was impressed with how diligently and carefully they inspected any ballots that are not totally clear to be sure they capture the voter's intent. Also, at this point they had ballots to deal with where they had exhausted every means of reaching voters who did not receive their ballots -- returned in the mail, etc. They were also working on 'problem children' as they dub them - ballots that are different from the ones we vote with here, i.e. sent overseas or online for those who are permitted to vote in these alternate formats. These arrive later than most and require extra attention as they are not machine-read.

My fellow Leaguer, Janice was there too, so we had a chance to chat. All in all, King County Election folks seemed to be knuckled down and moving towards meeting the deadline, even with the time lost to the weather related power outage of a rather long duration.

ElectionObservation4.jpg

Janet Sisson

I rotated from the Opening area (many steadfast worker bees, though some were more efficient than others) to the Envelope Review, Ballot Review, Alternate Foreign area, Traying Room, and Sorting area. I spent more time in the Opening area. I was reminded not to pass through the tables, only travel up and down the rows. An observer told me I would learn more each time I visited. Staff were friendly. Parking (at Renton King County Elections) was so challenging, there should be police present to direct traffic. Otherwise, the situation does not encourage voting.

 

Douglas Lucas, Part 1

Here are my notes from my November 5, 2024 observation (2:14pm - 3:07pm) at the King County Elections main facility on SW Grady Way.

 

After arriving, I entered the processing area with a single page template printed out from Scrutineers.org in my pocket. This would become important later. I had nothing else in my pockets. I signed in at the little table for observers and kept one of the red pens.

ElectionObservation6_2024.jpg
I walked right to the signature verification area, and began watching verifiers check signatures. Eventually I noticed another observer there too. She was an older woman observing for the Republican Party. She asked me what we should do if we saw a problem. I asked her what she'd seen, and she said that she saw a signature verification that she distrusted. I said we should probably talk to the signature verification supervisor about it. I accompanied this other observer to the seats where the regular staff / supervisors were seated working on their computers. Even though I hadn't seen the troubling signature verification myself, I think lending this visible support to the other observer was really helpful in ensuring her concern was addressed, so that she didn't have to ask the regular staff about it alone. We were directed by one staffer or another to Michelle, the signature verification lead. There were about four signature verification higher-up staffers; Michelle was one of them. The Republican Party observer recounted what she'd seen, essentially a newest signature being okayed even though she (the other observer) felt it didn't match the old/reference signature(s). Michelle at first said that the underling -- the one who'd okayed the signature -- was a very skilled verifier and that she (Michelle) and/or the higher-ups would review that underling's work as a matter of course. But with me standing next to her, the other observer politely yet firmly said that she wanted to observe this review by higher-ups. Michelle consented to reviewing it on the spot. Michelle reviewed multiple of this underling's recent verifications and eventually came across the signature that the Republican Party observer felt was doubtful. The GOP observer said "That's it!" or "That's almost certainly it!" and her confidence that these signatures on Michelle's screen were the ones in question grew. There was a newest signature, and then the three reference signatures. The top two reference signatures looked similar to the newest signature. But the bottom reference signature indeed looked different. Michelle scrutinized it and told us the bottom signature must have been signed, unlike the others, with a felt tip pen, for its lines were thicker. Yet the flow/pattern of the signature was the same, hence the underling okaying it. This explanation of Michelle's satisfied the Republican Party observer and me. I feel this anecdote is a good demonstration of how staff might need to be pressed a little to go out of their way to satisfy observers' concerns, and how observers can support one another -- just standing next to an observer raising a concern can add force of numbers and make the observer inquiry feel more legitimate to staff.
ElectionObservation5.jpg

Then I walked around various parts of the facility a while, observing things and noticing nothing untoward. I saw that while the software of the voting computers in King County is Boston-based Clear Ballot — something I already knew — I noticed today that the hardware of the two big scanners King County relies on is the ImageTrac-Lite ibml Series 6000. King County also has multiple smaller scanners for certain circumstances or especially busy days. Tonight, just to help out, I emailed that data to Verified Voting's Verifier, which tracks election equipment across the country.

 

At another point I talked with a male observer from the Republican Party. It seemed to be his first, or one his first times observing, as he seemed slightly inundated looking around at all the stages of the process going on simultaneously, the size of that big processing room. I mentioned I plan on attending Tuesday, November 19's risk-limiting audit and he asked me to explain what that was. It was a reminder how complicated elections are and how much there is to learn or unlearn or discuss with others. I bumped into one of the salaried staff members, I forget his name, who does a lot of the risk-limiting audit process. He asked me for my name and was really nice and said he looked forward to seeing me at the audit and explaining it.

ElectionObservation2.jpg

I talked with ballot processing manager Jerelyn Hampton some. She mentioned to someone else that King County Elections relies on Everett-based commercial printing vendor K&H Printers for printing and mailing most of the ballots. I asked her to repeat the company's name because I'm attuned to the potential black boxes involved when using private contractors for what should be public work. I removed my pen and Scrutineers page for my pocket so I could scribble down the name. Jerelyn did a double-take and asked me what the piece of paper was for. I showed her and explained it's just a template of things to look for when election-observing. Jerelyn got the gist of it immediately and recognized it wasn't a big problem but told me not to bring such a page in again since observers aren't supposed to bring in anything really, and the little table up front has blank pads of paper for observers to take/use/have. She was friendly about it, but it strikes me as a potential problem because that means observers will have to memorize things to look for such as recording the number of police officers seen, the names and roles of any contractors seen, and much more that might slip the mind of an already busy person trying to shoehorn in election-observing. I wonder if there is some compromise that would satisfy all, where observers could bring their templates in somehow, copy them by hand to the too-small-for-it-really pads, and then throw the template pages away.

 

Douglas Lucas, Part 2

Everything went great with my observing the risk-limiting audit at King County Elections today.

 

Jerelyn and Jonathan were very accommodating, patient with questions, friendly, upbeat, etc. In my opinion there should be some sort of civics in school for people to understand the voting system and how hard such election workers are working.


Return to Table of Contents


Program of Work Planning: 2025 - 2027

Barb Tengtio

What is League Program?

 

The LWV “Program” is the educational and advocacy platform adopted every two years. It implements the League mission of “Empowering Voters and Defending Democracy” through education and advocacy. Program Planning is the grassroots process by which LWV selects the work needed to implement our mission through education and advocacy. All League action, advocacy, and education are based on support for League Positions and League Principles. League action in support of League Positions may be taken only in those areas where there is member understanding and agreement.

 

What is Program Planning?

 

During the “Program Planning” process, members propose the program of work for the state League (LWVWA) for the next biennium. It begins at the local level, where members throughout the state consider issues their local league believes are important and should be addressed. Each local league puts out a call to its members to participate in the planning process. Members can propose issues to be addressed, and the local league will collectively decide what to prioritize and to submit for state consideration.

 

The proposals from Local Leagues must be made at least three months prior to convention. They are considered by the LWVWA board, which will formulate a recommended program at least 40 days prior to convention. At Convention, members decide the issues from the local leagues to be placed on our state level program agenda for the ensuing biennium (2025-2027). The process for Program Planning is set forth in the LWVWA Bylaws.

 

Identifying Issues for the State Program

 

Local leagues can propose the following items for the state League program: (1) a study; (2) an update to an existing study; (3) concurrence with an existing study; or (4) an educational program.

 

  • A Study is an in-depth, objective, and authenticated review of an issue. A Study is completely objective and does not advocate any position or outcome, but it may flag issues of interest to the League. Once drafted, and approved by the LWVWA board, a Study goes through a consensus process. The consensus process asks League members’ opinions on the issues identified in the Study and come to agreement on whether the LWVWA should adopt certain positions. It is a two-year process.
    • When considering whether to propose a new study, ask:
      • Does the League already have a position?
      • Is there a government solution to the problem?
      • Is there enough time to conduct a study, adopt a position, and then act to influence a resolution?

  • An Update to a position is done when the basis of the Study is valid, but there have been subsequent developments that may warrant additional information and positions. Generally, an update includes additional research and an update to the Study. It follows the same process as a Study, including a consensus process to update or adopt positions.
    • When considering whether to propose an update to a study, ask:
      • Is the League position still useful?
      • Is the position sufficiently general?
      • Are there significant developments in the issues that are not reflected in the current position?

  • A Concurrence is an adoption of a stated position based upon a study done by another league.
    • When considering whether to propose a concurrence, ask:
      • Is the existing study applicable or comparable to our state?
      • Is the existing position of sufficient use to us?
      • Does the existing study sufficiently cover the issue?
      • Does the existing study meet the standards required for LWVWA studies?

  • An Education Project is a program for educating the public and League members on certain topics. It is more limited than a Study, but also must be objective and supported by citations to credible authorities.
    • When considering whether to propose an Education Project, ask:
      • Does the community need help in understanding this issue and its possible solutions?
      • Is there enough time to develop and implement our project before citizens must make a decision?
      • Is it more important to help citizens understand this issue than to advocate our League position at this time?

A local league program planning meeting typically includes discussions for both local and state (in odd numbered years) or national (in even numbered years) issues. Proposals for the state League are reviewed and approved by the Local League board and submitted to the LWVWA. The LWVWA Board then determines which proposals to recommend, which is voted on by the delegates at Convention.

 

In making recommendations for State program items, it is important that members review the Program in Action, which sets out adopted state positions and Impact on Issues, which sets out the national LWV positions. In discussing issues to suggest, consider the following questions:

  • Is the issue of vital concern to our members, our communities, and our state that demands attention now?
  • How does the issue relate to the LWV mission?
  • Is the issue one where the League's special expertise or perspective would be valuable?
  • Would addressing the issue likely result in positive changes?
  • Would this issue provide the League opportunities to collaborate with other individuals and groups.

 

League members are motivated to work on an issue that has a measurable impact on our communities and/or our state; issues where there is a way to evaluate the results. In any event, it is crucial that there are League members willing to lead and serve on committees before selecting a recommendation.

 

What We Need from LWVSKC Members

 

As stated above, program planning begins at the local level, where members consider issues their local league believes are important and should be addressed. Please discuss this at your Unit meetings in December, January, and February and send your proposed issues to be addressed to Unit Liaisons Keela Williams and Sarah Beth Miller at unitliaison@lwvskc.org, by February 12. (If you are not associated with a specific Unit, please know that you can also send in an issue for consideration.) Include if your issue is (1) A Study; (2) An Update to an existing Study; (3) A Concurrence with an existing Study; or (4) An Educational Program. Also include scope - what will be covered and why.

To submit an issue, click here to complete the form, then share with Unit Liaisons. 
All issues will be reviewed, prioritized and submitted for state consideration.


Return to Table of Contents


Consensus Process & Program of Work Dates

Barb Tengtio


During the next few months, members of Local Leagues will have opportunities to participate in the consensus process for the current studies and plan the Programs of Work to be considered for adoption at the June 2025 LWVWA convention.  Please make note of the dates and deadlines pertaining to these two activities. 

General Informational ZOOM meeting on the Consensus Process and Program of Work Planning 
  • December 3, 2024 at 11:00am and 6:30pm 
  • December 15 - 22, 2024:  Study and consensus questions to local Leagues
  • Dec/Jan:  Study Committee hosts statewide Zoom informational meeting; recording will be available 
  • Jan/Feb:  Local Leagues undertake Study and Consensus; local League boards submit their League’s consensus   
Welcoming Immigrants to Washington State Study 
  • Jan 16-23:  Study and Consensus questions to local Leagues
  • Jan/Feb:  Study Committee hosts statewide Zoom informational meeting; recording will be available 
  • Feb/March:  Local Leagues undertake Study and Consensus; local League boards submit their League’s consensus 
Multi-Member District Education Project 
  • Nov 9:  Statewide Zoom Meeting held; view recording 
  • Nov 2024:  MMD Education Project is live on the LWVWA website
  • 2024 and 2025:  Committee members provide Educational Program for local Leagues 
Program of Work Planning 
  • Dec/Jan/Feb:  Local Leagues conduct Program of Work Planning
  • March 6:  Target deadline for local Leagues to submit study items to LWVWA Board


Return to Table of Contents


Congratulations: Callie Ridolfi, LWVSKC Unit Facilitator of the Month

Sarah Beth Miller

This month’s featured Unit Facilitator is Callie Ridolfi! Callie has been facilitating the Virtual Unit of the LWVSKC for nearly two years, and has been a member of the LWVSKC since 2020. Before joining, she had been aware of the LWV “for decades,” and knew of the League's reputation for well-researched, thoughtful positions and studies. For years, she had referred to the League’s annual TRY (They Represent You) pamphlet. In addition, veteran League member and current Voter Services Chair Julie Sarkissian was a Mercer Island neighbor and friend.  

Why the League of Women Voters?
What sparked Callie’s interest in the LWVSKC and motivated her to join in 2020 was the League’s priority on Climate Action. The mission of the City Climate Action Committee  made sense to her: Creating a proactive response to climate change through democratic engagement of King County residents in meeting their climate action goals for their cities.

As an environmental engineer, Callie has worked at the state, county, and city level on clean water, nuclear issues, salmon runs, waste management, sustainability, and a variety of other topics and projects. Through the City Climate Action Committee, the LWV offered a path to reach out to, and connect with, residents and stakeholders to hear their concerns, understand their goals, and develop plans that aligned with the community’s wishes.
IMG_6210.jpg
Partnering with King County, Callie and the Climate Action Committee developed the LWV’s innovative Climate Action Toolkits, which used a combination of checklists, surveys, and data to help cities better assess their climate action needs and goals.

Through her work on the City Climate Action Committee, Callie became aware of how the League organization provides a vital platform for engaging with the community. Callie appreciates the “freedom of form” offered by the LWV; there are multiple ways that the LWV enables people to communicate and educate one another, through their website, committees, public forums, and meetings.

She also recognized that the League’s non-partisan status was an asset, enabling people of various political stripes to come together to work on issues affecting their communities.

In addition, the LWV had a reputation for producing rigorous studies on environmental and other issues which were valued and meaningful to politicians, residents, and stakeholders.

Her activity on the Climate Committee inspired Callie to organize an LWVSKC Forum entitled, Climate Justice: Down with Carbon Emissions - and up with Community Equity! Callie pulled together a diverse panel of local experts to address Climate Justice; with her input, the LWV also developed a website that made the process of Climate Action more understandable and accessible to communities. More recently, Callie has been supporting the State LWV on the No on 2117 campaign. 

The Virtual Unit
The Virtual Unit (VU) is unique among the Seattle-King Co. Units because all meetings are held virtually, via Zoom. Since members aren’t traveling to a physical location, the Virtual Unit membership is broader geographically than that of the other six neighborhood-based Units.

The VU is open to any member of the LWVSKC. Moreover, any member of the LWVSKC, including those from other Units is enthusiastically welcome to join the VU for any meetings that interest them. This fall, the Virtual Unit organized a meeting to educate themselves and other LWVSKC members about the Initiatives on the November ballot; it attracted about 35 participants, many of whom were not VU members.

Callie emphasizes that the VU is a self-directed unit. Unit members determine the topics for the next meeting’s agenda, based on the collective interests of the group. Callie says that as facilitator, “I post the agenda for the next meeting, remind folks to come, and facilitate discussion about the agenda topics.” 

A Commitment to Social Justice
Callie thinks that the League is a good fit for her (and vice-versa) because of her lifelong ethos of social justice. As a child growing up in Denver, she volunteered to be bussed to a school across town to benefit from education in a more diverse school and community. 

A social justice lens has informed Callie’s environmental engineering career. She has worked in non-profit and business sectors in leadership roles, but a particular focus and passion has been on working with tribal communities throughout the Northwest and Alaska and supporting them with environmental protection, cleanup, and restoration. She is currently semi-retired, and part-owner and director of a social venture, RIDOLFI Inc. 

As busy and involved as she is, Callie places a high value on outdoor recreation. Favorite activities are biking and cross-country skiing; she says, “Getting out and exercising always make my days go better!”

Return to Table of Contents


Board Meeting Highlights

Marie Cooley


Co-president Barb Tengtio called the meeting to order at 10:03am. Barb welcomed board members and guests and reminded us that November is National American Indian Heritage Month, and shared a land acknowledgement used by the City of Kirkland. Barb also shared a book list compiled by King County Libraries and encouraged us to learn about the first inhabitants of the Salish Sea.

Lease Update: Barb/Kim

After months of negotiation, Barb presented the board with an updated lease agreement for their approval. The office will be moved into a smaller space on the 8th floor of the Melbourne building, approximately half the size of the current office. The rent for the rest of the lease will be capped at the new rate for the duration of the lease (three years and 4 months). The DOC (building maintenance fees) will be subject to change. The new lease represents total savings of $26,852.04 per year, currently shared with LWVWA. The office move is planned for early December.


Investment Committee: Kim/Murugeshwari/Phillippa

The committee welcomed two new members – Murugeshwari Subram and Phillippa Kassover. One of the recommendations from the Annual Financial Review was to allocate stocks at 50% stocks and 50% bonds. (Previously 40% stocks and 60% bonds.) Kim and Cindy were asked to Check with Morgan Stanley and make the change.


Voter Services: Julie

Julie reported that October was almost as busy for Voter Services as September - 31 members volunteered for 51 shifts and 19 events! We continued to have requests right up to Election Day. The King Conservation District has asked LWVSKC to hold a candidate forum for their upcoming election in January.

 

Unit Update: Sarah Beth/Keela

Keela reports that she, Sarah Beth, Julie, and Barb met with a group of East side members to assess interest in starting a new Unit; 75 members were contacted and 15 attended the meeting.


Results of the Survey on Volunteer Reimbursement: Britt

A discussion at the October Board meeting prompted Britt to create a short survey on volunteer reimbursement; 73 members responded. Results: Most volunteers are not incurring personal expenses other than travel and parking, which have not prohibited participation. As a League, we want to make it possible for everyone to volunteer, with no restrictions. A policy of reimbursement will be drafted and made available soon.


National Membership Registration Program: Barb

The National Member Registration Program will go into effect in February. There are Training classes available for treasurers and membership chairs to get up to speed on the new system. Kim suggests that if you plan to purchase gift memberships this year, do it before Christmas. Gift membership information can be found here. You can also renew your annual membership before the beginning of the year.


The December meeting will be on December 21 at our new office.


Return to Table of Contents


We’d Like to Hear from You!


Not sure who to reach? You can always find us at info@lwvskc.org or 206-329-4848 or check our events calendar for more information.

Want to stop by our office? We have office hours every Tuesday and Thursday, 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.  We’re located at: 


Melbourne Tower

1511 3rd Avenue, Suite 801

Seattle, WA 98101


Executive Committee of the Board of LWVSKC

Co-President

Kim Albert

president@lwvskc.org

Co-President

Barbara Tengtio

president@lwvskc.org

Vice-President

Brittany Miles

 brittm@lwvskc.org

Secretary

Marie Cooley

secretary@lwvskc.org

Co-Treasurer

Carol Levin

treasurer@lwvskc.org

Co-Treasurer

Joanna Cullen

treasurer@lwvskc.org


Directors of the Board of LWVSKC
 

Director at Large

Phillipa Kassover

 

Co-Unit Liaison

Sarah Beth Miller

unitliaison@lwvskc.org

Co-Unit Liaison

Keela Williams

unitliaison@lwvskc.org

Director at Large

Laura C Rudert

 

Voter Services Chair

Julie Sarkissian

voterservices@lwvskc.org

Director at Large

Murugeshwari Subramanaian

 


Committee Chairs for LWVSKC

Economics and Taxation

Kim Albert
Marilee Fuller

kim.a@lwvskc.org
marileefuller@yahoo.com

Education

Joanna Cullen

jfoxcullen@gmail.com

Investment

Cindy Piennett

cindypiennett@gmail.com

Observer Corps

Grace Sanderson

 observercorps@lwvskc.org


Nominating Committee for LWVSKC

Chair

Sarah Haeger

nominate@lwvskc.org

Member Chelsea Jordan

nominate@lwvskc.org

Member

Kathy Jorgensen

nominate@lwvskc.org


And if you’re looking for the editor of The Voter, reach out to votereditor@lwvskc.org!


Find us on the web at lwvskc.org!


Return to Table of Contents

Quick link for this page is: https://www.lwvskc.org/thevoter